A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board weighs $317,000 Neonet technology services contract amid questions about vendor costs

May 04, 2026 | Stow-Munroe Falls City School District, School Districts, Ohio


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board weighs $317,000 Neonet technology services contract amid questions about vendor costs
The board reviewed and approved a one‑year services contract with Neonet that packages technical support, student‑device oversight and safety‑monitoring tools and lists an approximate total cost of $317,000 for the contracted services. Administration said the price represents the aggregate costs of three contracted staff (a technology coordinator and two desktop support technicians) plus training, benefits, systems access and coordination with regional/state technology networks.

Board members questioned whether outsourcing still offered a cost advantage, noting the district’s existing in‑district tech liaison (Josh Kramer appears on the staff directory) and asking for ticket‑count and utilization metrics to justify the contracted headcount. Administration said the district operates a lean tech department across nine buildings and pointed to the contract’s inclusion of higher‑level systems‑engineering support and coordination with E‑Rate (federal connectivity subsidy) requirements.

The presentation explained that because Neonet is also a provider, it cannot serve as a consultant for E‑Rate procurement; the district instead uses a separate E‑Rate consultant for procurement work and may rely on Neonet only in vendor bids as permitted. Board members asked for detailed vendor‑contract volume reviews as the board considers other reductions and asked whether the district’s one‑to‑one Chromebook model affects long‑term tech staffing needs.

The district acknowledged the need to track tickets and utilization to evaluate if an internal staffing model could be less expensive and said such metrics would be provided to the board in follow‑up. The contract motion passed by roll call during the meeting.

Next steps: administration to supply ticket counts, utilization and contract‑volume data for board review as part of broader vendor‑spend analysis.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee