Negotiators engaged in an extended exchange about how to preserve meaningful teacher collaboration without imposing inequitable burdens. Teachers described the current Wednesday model as uneven across buildings: high schools often rely on Wednesdays because they lack overlapping plan times, while elementary and middle schools use a mix of plan time and PLCs during the day.
Participants identified three central problems: inconsistent implementation across buildings (buy-in), frequency (weekly Wednesdays may be overused), and student-contact implications (early-release or full-day PD options reduce instructional minutes). Proposed alternatives included sprinkling collaboration days into the calendar (e.g., a few strategically scheduled early releases or half days per year), returning to quarterly early releases or late starts, or creating targeted districtwide grade-level alignment days.
District finance staff warned of cost and logistical constraints (child care, buses, limits on mills and the LOB cap) and committed to preparing per-day cost breakdowns and a draft calendar mapping existing PD/PLC days so negotiators can weigh options. Parties agreed to create a shared brainstorming spreadsheet and to meet again on Monday the 4th to review proposed calendar options and rough costings.