A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Amagansett owner proposes to relocate house, remove geocubes and restore shoreline; ZBA closes hearing after detailed debate

April 28, 2026 | EAST HAMPTON UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, School Districts, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Amagansett owner proposes to relocate house, remove geocubes and restore shoreline; ZBA closes hearing after detailed debate
The Zoning Board continued and then closed the public hearing on a proposal by Nigel Curtis to relocate a shoreline residence landward and remove an existing geocube revetment on Cranberry Hole Road in Amagansett.

Attorney Richard A. Hammer and coastal contractor Billy Mack described a staged removal protocol: excavate and expose the geocube bags from above, strap and slice open the bags, let the beach‑compatible sand spill landward, and reshape the dune to an appropriate angle of repose before revegetating with native beach grass. "That sand will remain and will utilize that sand to stabilize the eroded bluff," Billy Mack said when explaining how the sand from the bags would be handled.

Planning Department staff supported removal and restoration but warned the board that existing survey data may be outdated and stressed that careful protocol is needed because portions of the work occur at or near high tide; Brian Frank said the planning department would encourage placing as much sand as possible above mean high water and planting beach grass to help long‑term stability. Neighbors and an adjacent property owner’s counsel asked for more detail on how removal would avoid harm to downdrift parcels and requested that plans address flank erosion on the neighbor’s lot.

The board discussed timing: applicants said removal is likely to follow relocation of the residence (construction access and safety considerations), and that DEC review and other permits may also be required. After extended technical testimony and planning commentary, the board voted to close the public hearing and record; the planning department and applicants agreed the proposed protocol—if followed—would be an environmental improvement compared with leaving geocubes in place, but several technical details (updated survey, volumes, and neighbor protections) were left for post‑hearing submissions or permit review.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee