Commissioners accept Texas A&M demand-response transit plan; ask staff for phased cost options
April 27, 2026 | El Paso County, Texas
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The El Paso County Commissioner's Court voted April 27 to accept the Texas A&M Transportation Institute's General Public Demand Response Transit (GPDRT) study, a planning document that lays out a multi-component approach to expanding transit in the county's unserved outer areas.
TTI recommended an approach that includes (1) co-mingling ADA paratransit trips with scheduled general-public riders to improve fleet utilization, (2) on-demand microtransit pilots in targeted zones, (3) a user-side subsidy program to reimburse partner providers (taxi/ride-hail or community operators) for specific trip types, and (4) a volunteer driver program that would reimburse vetted volunteers for mileage when appropriate.
Kelly Bloom of TTI told the court the combination of approaches aims to expand coverage in low-density areas at lower per-trip cost than running fixed routes into far-flung neighborhoods. "These models let us tailor service for the outer county where fixed routes are cost-prohibitive," Bloom said. County transit staff said the initial estimated cost of launching all components simultaneously would be about $631,000 for FY27, but stressed pilots and phased implementation would lower up-front needs.
Commissioners asked staff and El Paso Area Transportation Services (ETA) to return with near-term, midterm and long-term budgeting options and to identify potential grant support; county administration confirmed rural transit grants under Federal Transit Administration Section 5311 remain available and that the county could pursue a phased approach that starts with the lowest-cost pilots.
The court accepted the report, but did not commit to immediate full funding: commissioners requested a menu of implementation scenarios and cost-sharing proposals for the upcoming strategic budget discussions.
TTI recommended an approach that includes (1) co-mingling ADA paratransit trips with scheduled general-public riders to improve fleet utilization, (2) on-demand microtransit pilots in targeted zones, (3) a user-side subsidy program to reimburse partner providers (taxi/ride-hail or community operators) for specific trip types, and (4) a volunteer driver program that would reimburse vetted volunteers for mileage when appropriate.
Kelly Bloom of TTI told the court the combination of approaches aims to expand coverage in low-density areas at lower per-trip cost than running fixed routes into far-flung neighborhoods. "These models let us tailor service for the outer county where fixed routes are cost-prohibitive," Bloom said. County transit staff said the initial estimated cost of launching all components simultaneously would be about $631,000 for FY27, but stressed pilots and phased implementation would lower up-front needs.
Commissioners asked staff and El Paso Area Transportation Services (ETA) to return with near-term, midterm and long-term budgeting options and to identify potential grant support; county administration confirmed rural transit grants under Federal Transit Administration Section 5311 remain available and that the county could pursue a phased approach that starts with the lowest-cost pilots.
The court accepted the report, but did not commit to immediate full funding: commissioners requested a menu of implementation scenarios and cost-sharing proposals for the upcoming strategic budget discussions.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
