Speakers urge Gaithersburg leaders to scrutinize events tied to VHP America and related groups

Several members of the public used the council’s comment period on April 20 to urge Gaithersburg leaders to scrutinize events and groups they said have ties to the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and VHP America.

"If hate comes to Gaithersburg, please don't invite it. Please don't celebrate it," Scott Weber said, describing recent programming he said linked local events to a violent Hindu nationalist movement. Weber asked officials to investigate organizers behind events and to avoid honoring groups connected, in his view, to extremist actions.

Peter Friedrich provided historical allegations and described violent incidents in India associated with the VHP and its parent movements. Friedrich said, "On December 6th, 1992, a Hindu nationalist mob...organized by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad raised a 16th century mosque...setting off sectarian riots that murdered 2,000 Muslims," and alleged that VHP America has hosted events in local schools. He urged local leaders to consider the groups’ backgrounds before extending invitations.

Ajit Sahi, national director of public affairs for the Indian‑American Muslim Council, described broader international tensions and referenced a U.S. Department of Justice press release and diplomatic disputes involving alleged actions by foreign actors. He urged council members to take a "very good look" at these U.S.‑based organizations and their affiliations.

Councilmembers accepted the written materials and asked speakers to leave documents with the clerk; no city response or formal staff report was provided that evening. The council did not discuss or vote on any actions related to event vetting or venue use during the meeting.

Context and limits: Speakers made historical and political claims linking U.S.‑based groups to movements in India and referenced investigations and statements from federal or foreign governments. The comments recorded at the April 20 meeting are allegations and calls for scrutiny; the transcript does not contain a response from the organizations named nor any staff findings.

Ending: Speakers left written materials with the clerk; the council requested the documents be provided to staff for any necessary follow‑up.