Editorial audit and corrections applied
April 17, 2026 | Building Code Council, Governor's Office - Boards & Commissions, Executive, Washington
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Audit summary (applied before final revision):
- Spelling/Name consistency: Multiple transcript variants occurred (e.g., "Tim Attebery" vs "Tim Atterbury", "Kjell" spelled "Kjells" in places). We standardized to the spellings used at first explicit self-identification in the transcript (Tim Attebery; Kjell Anderson). Severity: medium — corrected in speaker list and article text.
- Speaker identification: Some lines used the label "SBCC Meeting Room" to represent staff audio; we represented that voice as "SBCC staff / Staff member" in metadata and used named individual speakers only where self-identified. Severity: medium — corrected by mapping staff utterances to the functional label "Staff member".
- Baseline modeling: The transcript repeatedly noted the statutory baseline is the 2006 Washington State Energy Code but PNNL provided 2004/2007 proxies; we did not invent any 2006 modeling results. Severity: high (policy significance) — we explicitly noted 2006 is statutory baseline and that PNNL’s modeled proxies were used pending a 2006 model.
- NA cells and missing modeled measures: The transcript shows NA entries and missing measures (induction cooking, thermal-energy networks). We recorded these as unmodeled and did not invent values. Severity: medium — highlighted as pending modeling tasks.
- OPMA concern: Patrick Hanks raised an Open Public Meetings Act notice concern; we recorded the allegation and its unresolved status in the claims matrix rather than adjudicating it. Severity: high (legal) — staff follow-up required.
- Vote recording: The meeting used voice votes; specific roll-call tallies were not always available. We recorded outcomes and noted voice vote method and presence counts where possible. Severity: medium.
All corrections were applied in the final articles (names and role-labelling normalized, no invented facts added). If staff supplies a formal attendance roster, final vote tallies, or the PNNL 2006 baseline model, articles can be updated to add those specifics.
- Spelling/Name consistency: Multiple transcript variants occurred (e.g., "Tim Attebery" vs "Tim Atterbury", "Kjell" spelled "Kjells" in places). We standardized to the spellings used at first explicit self-identification in the transcript (Tim Attebery; Kjell Anderson). Severity: medium — corrected in speaker list and article text.
- Speaker identification: Some lines used the label "SBCC Meeting Room" to represent staff audio; we represented that voice as "SBCC staff / Staff member" in metadata and used named individual speakers only where self-identified. Severity: medium — corrected by mapping staff utterances to the functional label "Staff member".
- Baseline modeling: The transcript repeatedly noted the statutory baseline is the 2006 Washington State Energy Code but PNNL provided 2004/2007 proxies; we did not invent any 2006 modeling results. Severity: high (policy significance) — we explicitly noted 2006 is statutory baseline and that PNNL’s modeled proxies were used pending a 2006 model.
- NA cells and missing modeled measures: The transcript shows NA entries and missing measures (induction cooking, thermal-energy networks). We recorded these as unmodeled and did not invent values. Severity: medium — highlighted as pending modeling tasks.
- OPMA concern: Patrick Hanks raised an Open Public Meetings Act notice concern; we recorded the allegation and its unresolved status in the claims matrix rather than adjudicating it. Severity: high (legal) — staff follow-up required.
- Vote recording: The meeting used voice votes; specific roll-call tallies were not always available. We recorded outcomes and noted voice vote method and presence counts where possible. Severity: medium.
All corrections were applied in the final articles (names and role-labelling normalized, no invented facts added). If staff supplies a formal attendance roster, final vote tallies, or the PNNL 2006 baseline model, articles can be updated to add those specifics.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
