A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board authorizes pursuit of up to $100 million refunding bond and $25 million tech bond

April 17, 2026 | East Side Union High, School Districts, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board authorizes pursuit of up to $100 million refunding bond and $25 million tech bond
At its April 16 meeting, the East Side Union High School District board voted to authorize staff to pursue refinancing previously issued Measure E bonds and to issue a short‑term general obligation bond to finance technology projects.

Staff presented Resolution 2025/2026‑28 to authorize refunding general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $100 million to refinance three prior series issued under Measure E (2015 refunding bonds, 2016 refunding bonds Series B and the 2008 Measure E series). Joe Crump of Dale Scott and Company summarized potential structures and said expected market outcomes could produce between about $3.8 million and $5 million in gross savings depending on how the refunding is structured. Chick Adams, bond counsel from Jones Hall, explained that underwriting and counsel fees—estimated in the vicinity of $200,000—would be paid from bond proceeds and that staff would monitor market conditions and could suspend issuance if refinancing did not make fiscal sense.

Trustees also considered Resolution 2025/2026‑29 to authorize a Series A general obligation issue under Measure N to finance technology projects, projected as a three‑year borrowing structured to match useful life and to carry relatively low interest cost. Board members asked about timing; staff indicated bonds would go to market likely in late May with a June close if approved to proceed.

After discussion, trustees moved and adopted both resolutions directing staff to proceed with necessary documents (preliminary official statement, bond purchase agreement and related documents). The board’s actions were approvals to pursue issuance and related agreements, not final bond pricing authority; issuances would proceed only if pricing and market conditions met district requirements.

The district did not commit general fund dollars to pay the fees; presenters said those costs are paid from bond proceeds. The board directed staff to keep trustees informed of market developments prior to marketing and sale.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee