A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Resident urges Shelton to review automated license-plate readers, cites state law SB60002 and privacy concerns

April 08, 2026 | Shelton, Mason County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Resident urges Shelton to review automated license-plate readers, cites state law SB60002 and privacy concerns
On Zoom, Matthew Hilton told Shelton’s council he was concerned about automated license-plate readers (ALPRs) installed by private companies such as Flock, Motorola and Axon. He referenced recently passed SB60002 and said the law restricts ALPR placement in sensitive locations; he said two local cameras may be adjacent to Shelton High School and St. Edward’s Catholic Church and asked the council to investigate whether those installations comply with the statute.

Hilton also asked whether Shelton Police use mobile ALPRs — trailer-mounted units or vehicle-mounted systems — and urged the city to disable mobile readers if they are operating because, he said, mobile systems can collect data while passing sensitive sites. He warned that private companies ultimately control collected data and alleged that ALPR data has been shared with federal immigration authorities in other jurisdictions.

Council response and context: the comment was made during the public-comment period; council did not take immediate action at the meeting but the concern was placed on the record. Council members and staff did not state a departmental policy at this meeting; staff follow-up would be required to confirm whether police operate mobile ALPRs and whether any camera locations are inconsistent with SB60002.

From the record: Hilton named SB60002 and company names and described locations he believed may be in violation; those allegations were marked for staff follow-up rather than resolved during the April 7 meeting.

Next steps: staff should confirm existing ALPR locations and uses, verify compliance with SB60002 or other legal constraints, and report back to the council before contract renewal decisions.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee