A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Finance panel advances controversial 5% in‑game purchase fee to fund youth mental‑health services

May 11, 2026 | 2026 Legislature CO, Colorado


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Finance panel advances controversial 5% in‑game purchase fee to fund youth mental‑health services
Senate Finance advanced House Bill 14‑18, a bill that would impose a 5% fee on certain online in‑game “add‑on” purchases to create two enterprises that fund youth mental‑health programs including the youth mental health peer navigator (the "core"), out‑of‑school time grants, and expanded sessions for existing youth mental‑health services.

Sponsor Sen. Amabile said the fee targets negative externalities from a growing online gaming economy and supplies a dedicated revenue stream for programs that would otherwise lose federal support. "This is a creative way to fund mental‑health services for youth," the sponsor said, noting she prefers general‑fund solutions but said the state lacks the necessary resources.

Opponents included the Behavioral Health Administration and representatives of the Entertainment Software Association, who raised legal and administrative objections. Ryan Templeton for the BHA warned that the proposed funding model could be legally vulnerable under the Internet Tax Freedom Act, dormant commerce clause and equal protection concerns, and could jeopardize program stability if litigation follows. Andrew O'Connor of the Entertainment Software Association said the fee would largely fall on consumers, pose geolocation and collection challenges for companies, and in his view unfairly singles out one industry and one group of consumers.

Supporters — including local child‑wellbeing organizations, Disability Law Colorado, Boys & Girls Clubs and youth advocacy groups — described how peer navigator programs, crisis response teams and after‑school grants have demonstrated measurable benefits and said this dedicated funding would sustain proven interventions.

Committee members discussed administrative cost language: a fiscal note technical issue showed a potential 4.5% administrative estimate in year one while bill language capped administrative expenses at 3%; sponsors offered an amendment (L32) to shift enterprise startup timing so administrative costs would be covered after an initial revenue collection period. After amendment and discussion the committee moved HB14‑18 as amended to Appropriations on a 5‑4 vote.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee