Public defender office warns new standards and rising filings strain Spokane capacity

City staff and the Public Defender's Office told the Public Safety & Community Health Committee that Spokane is confronting a shortfall in legal defense capacity driven by a recent reduction in recommended caseload standards and a jump in municipal court filings.

“Starting in 2026 we have to drop 10 percent [of caseloads] each year,” Nick Anthos, the chief public defender, told the committee, describing mandatory standards that move per‑attorney caseload thresholds downward from historical levels and noting that a national study revised standards to account for extra investigative and evidence‑review time.

Anthos said the office has filed more than 160 notices of unavailability this year because it cannot accept new appointments without violating the standards, and warned that continued shortages could trigger speedy‑trial pressures that lead to case delays and possible dismissals if the court cannot ensure representation within statutory deadlines.

City staff described short‑term steps to blunt the impact: adding two outreach workers to downtown via the Catholic Charities contract to reduce law‑enforcement involvement in low‑acuity calls, funding four Rule‑9 student interns (estimated to equal one FTE) from vacancy savings, and pursuing a single consolidated public defender job classification to improve pay competitiveness. Staff said they are also evaluating whether changing Spokane's current direct‑file model — where police file municipal charges directly — to a prosecutorial review model would help, though the latter would require additional prosecutor resources and policy changes.

Council members pressed staff on funding sources and timing. Staff said the caseload reductions are phased (roughly a 10% reduction year‑over‑year) and that additional hires will be required to stay compliant; they flagged an urgent recruiting need and said they will present budget proposals and funding options to council.

The committee did not adopt any ordinance; council discussion focused on staffing, funding sources and whether charging processes should be altered to reduce downstream pressure on defenders.