Candidate defends tax‑increment deals used to land data centers, says ROI to residents must drive incentives

On a Utah County Republican Party podcast, Tom West Morland described his approach to economic development and incentives, using Eagle Mountain’s data‑center experience as an example.

West Morland recounted that the initial Meta (Facebook) project in Eagle Mountain included substantial private investment and an unusually large infrastructure contribution. "When Facebook came in they spent they wrote a check for $120 million... all of that went into infrastructure, went into roads, it went into water, went into power, went into sewer," he said. He argued that such upfront private investment can bootstrap local economies — attracting grocery stores, fast food and other services — and lower future tax burdens.

On tax‑increment financing (TIFF) and other incentive tools, West Morland emphasized there is no one‑size‑fits‑all decision. He proposed principles: evaluate the return on investment for residents, check whether the project fits the county's long‑term vision, and respect local decision‑making ("federalism"), while recognizing that some jurisdictions may need stronger incentives than others.

On fairness, West Morland acknowledged tradeoffs — early bidders receive bigger incentives — but said later projects benefit from the infrastructure the first investor helped build. He argued incentives should be structured so residents, not outside companies, are the principal winners.

Why it matters: Counties and cities regularly use incentives to attract large investments. The transcript provides a candidate perspective that favors negotiated incentives when they clearly support long‑term local benefits and infrastructure funding.

Next steps: West Morland said he would apply a return‑on‑investment test, seek transparent negotiations and prioritize projects that align with county vision and bring measurable resident benefits.