A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Rules Committee approves consent agenda and separately passes HR 111

May 11, 2026 | California State Assembly, House, Legislative, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Rules Committee approves consent agenda and separately passes HR 111
The California State Assembly Rules Committee convened and approved its consent agenda, then removed item 8 for a separate vote and passed HR 111 in a subsequent roll-call vote.

Chair opened the meeting and asked the secretary to call the roll; after the committee established a quorum the chair announced a consent agenda and a member moved to approve it. The chair then asked that item 8 be removed from the consent agenda "and vote on it separately, please," a request recorded in the transcript.

The committee approved the remainder of the consent agenda by roll call; the chair declared the motion passed. The transcript records a sequence of short confirmations and aye votes from committee members and the chair's declaration that the motion passed.

The chair then called for a motion on item number 8, identified in the spoken record as "HR 111 by Assemblymember Ziburr." A motion and a second were recorded and the secretary conducted a roll-call vote. The transcript records 'aye' votes for Pacheco, Arons, Dixon, Garcia, Gonzales and Erwin and records Lackey and Sanchez as "not voting." The transcript also shows the sponsor's name spelled inconsistently ("Ziburr" in one place and "Zuber" later); the clerk's reported vote for that entry is "aye" and the chair declared the motion passed.

The transcript does not describe the subject matter, text, or provisions of HR 111; no bill language or summary appears in the spoken record. The meeting concluded immediately after the chair announced the motion had passed and adjourned the committee.

Because the recording is a short procedural session, the transcript contains several repeated roll-call lines and inconsistent name spellings; those artifacts create ambiguity in per-member vote records. The text above reflects what is explicitly in the transcript and does not infer the content of HR 111 or the reasons members voted as they did.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee