A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board briefed on Brown Act changes in SB707: consolidated 'just cause' rules and remote‑participation clarifications

March 20, 2026 | Santa Rosa City, Sonoma County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board briefed on Brown Act changes in SB707: consolidated 'just cause' rules and remote‑participation clarifications
City staff briefed the Board of Public Utilities on recent Brown Act updates implemented through Senate Bill 707 and explained how the changes affect remote participation and conduct for board members.

Michelle Mononttoya, an administrative analyst and the recording secretary for the board, said SB707 collapses previous remote‑participation rules into a single 'just cause' provision under Government Code section 54953.8 and clarified reasons members may participate remotely (caregiving, contagious illness, physical or mental condition, official city travel, and several new categories such as care for an immunocompromised family member). She said when a member uses just cause, the member must disclose if any adults over 18 are present at the remote location and that public comment must be taken from Zoom in those cases.

Mononttoya noted that when a formal accommodation is granted the remote participant counts toward the in‑person quorum and that there is no limit on participation while the accommodation remains active. She also reviewed teleconferencing rules that require a public, accessible remote location when used and reiterated that annual limits on just‑cause remote participation still apply absent an accommodation. The clerk’s office plans to recommend a reasonable‑accommodation policy and amendments to local code addressing minute requirements.

Mononttoya emphasized two operational items the board will see in policy updates: a prohibition on board members reacting (liking or commenting) to each other’s social media posts when those posts relate to the board’s jurisdiction, and extension of disruptive‑behavior authorities to virtual participation so the presiding officer may warn, limit or remove virtual participants.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee