A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Ontario council approves up to $100 million in lease revenue bonds; residents press city on homelessness, code enforcement and aircraft noise

May 09, 2026 | Ontario, San Bernardino County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Ontario council approves up to $100 million in lease revenue bonds; residents press city on homelessness, code enforcement and aircraft noise
The Ontario City Council on May 9 voted to approve two bond-related resolutions allowing the Ontario Public Financing Authority to issue lease revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $100,000,000 to finance public capital improvements.

The City Clerk said notice of the public hearing had been given and affidavits of compliance were on file; no written or oral comments were submitted on the item during the hearing. After the clerk's presentation, a councilmember moved to "approve as presented," and the motion passed.

Why it matters: the bond authorization enables the city's financing arm to sell debt to pay for eligible public capital projects. The council's approval sets the legal framework for bond sale and related agreements, though the transcript does not specify which capital projects would be funded or a sale timeline.

The City Attorney reported earlier that the council had met in closed session on two real-estate negotiation items under Government Code section 54956.8 and that council members provided direction to staff but there was "no reportable action." The attorney outlined the two parcels: one identified as 1135 East State Street with the negotiating party Richard Barber and the city's negotiator Mr. Ochoa; the other referenced in the transcript as "APN 20 7" with San Juan Owners LLC also negotiating with Mr. Ochoa on price and terms.

Residents used the public-comment period to press the council on several quality-of-life issues. Longtime resident Joe Sengland told the council Montclair School District built an administration building near his home at 767 North Eldorado Avenue that now blocks his mountain view, and he said district grounds between the school buildings and his property had been neglected. "They put up buildings that blocks our view," Sengland said, adding he has performed his own mulch work to keep weeds off his property and complained of unequal enforcement when neighbors park on lawns. Sengland also said neighbors' outdoor cooking and wood burning cause headaches in his house; staff indicated Mr. Murphy would speak with him after the meeting.

Laurie Massanis urged the city to take more aggressive action on homelessness, noting California's large share of the nation's homeless population and citing Coronado's approach that pairs enforcement of encampment rules with a homeless-service provider. "If we could still have that same gumption and, you know, aggressiveness on that issue, it would help," Massanis said, recalling a 2010 tent-city response in Ontario.

Jesse Fonseca asked the council to put aircraft noise and a changed flight pattern on a future agenda, saying planes now frequently pass over his home and disrupt outdoor family time. "The airplane noise is just getting worse and worse," Fonseca said, asking for the matter to be scheduled for study.

What the record shows: the meeting produced no reportable closed-session action, the consent calendar passed (moved by Bowman and seconded by Valencia, per the record), and the bond-related resolutions under Item 14 were approved after a public hearing with no public objections recorded. The transcript does not include a roll-call vote tally for the bond motion or detail which projects the bond proceeds will finance.

Next steps: the council approved the resolutions that authorize issuance and related agreements; further action would be required before bonds are sold and projects funded. Staff was asked to follow up on several public-comment items, including code-enforcement concerns and neighborhood impacts raised by speakers.

(Reporting by the City Clerk's public record and council proceedings.)

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee