Resident Matthew Nash told supervisors that his assessment climbed sharply and asked whether the county plans to cut spending rather than raise taxes to close an approximately $6 million shortfall. County leaders responded that the county-wide average assessment increase was about 16.5%, that equalization of tax rates will shift outcomes for some taxpayers, and that the budget process will consider a mix of revenue sources (personal property, meals taxes, boats, cigarettes) and spending reductions.
Supervisors stressed balancing services and tax rates. Dr. Leming and others said they want to minimize real-estate tax increases and noted that the county’s reassessment cadence has changed over time; the board previously advocated for a three-year reassessment cycle to reduce the shock of large one-time changes. Staff noted technical constraints to annual reassessments in some parts of the county that lack adequate sales data.
On capital maintenance, finance staff and a supervisor explained the county’s Facilities Maintenance, Repair and Replacement (FMRR) reserve: it has accumulated to about $1.5 million over roughly 11 years because budgeted projects sometimes come in under estimate, allowing the unspent amounts to accumulate. Current year requests total just under $1.1 million in projects. County staff said routine preventive maintenance is handled in house when feasible, but the county lacks capacity to execute large, $3M-scale projects without contracting and additional project-management and engineering resources.
A supervisor suggested the school division could dedicate residual fund balance to its own FMRR needs; staff said school capital requests often come to the county when they might instead be funded from school-held FMRR reserves. Officials said they will study FMRR project prioritization, staff capacity and whether any of the reserve can be applied to near-term projects without undermining contingency cushions.