Charter reviewers recommend a technology and surveillance oversight board to advise council on AI and cameras

A commission recommendation to establish a council-created technology and surveillance oversight board (item 203) won broad support as members raised concerns about unreported cameras, automatic license-plate readers and the use of facial-recognition or other AI-enabled surveillance tools.

Supporters said a resident advisory board would provide expertise, transparency and a public review mechanism for city use of surveillance technology; one speaker described the proposed board as a way to ensure data-ownership rules, retention limits and use policies are publicly vetted. Others warned rapid technological change means detailed restrictions could quickly become obsolete; several commissioners favored a charter-level recommendation that directs council to adopt oversight mechanisms while leaving technical specifics to policy.

The commission agreed to include the recommendation to create a technology and surveillance oversight board in the materials presented to council. Members asked staff to frame the proposal as a recommendation (rather than as a prescriptive charter mandate) so council and staff could design appropriate structure, membership criteria and interoperability with state law and public-safety needs.