A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Troy board denies 6-foot front-fence request, permits 4-foot shadow-box with setback relief

May 08, 2026 | Troy, Rensselaer County, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Troy board denies 6-foot front-fence request, permits 4-foot shadow-box with setback relief
Mark Heffernan, who identified himself at the meeting as living at 34 Brunswick Road, asked the board for permission to install a 4–6-foot scallop-top fence in his front yard to protect a son who elopes.

Heffernan described a design that curves from 6 feet at posts down to 4 feet between posts to balance privacy and neighborhood visibility. Board members and neighbors voiced aesthetic concerns about a solid 6-foot front-yard fence and pointed to local precedent favoring 4-foot front fences. Staff and members discussed how the property’s existing U-drive and plantings would interact with any new fence and whether emergency access would be affected.

Under questioning, Heffernan said he was willing to amend the application to a 4-foot shadow-box (transparent) fence. The board voted down the requested 6-foot area variance (reported tally: four nos, one yes) and then approved an area-variance relief for the front setback so the applicant can place a 4-foot shadow-box fence closer to the property line. The approval included conditions recorded on the record: the finished fence should be 4 feet high, use a shadow-box (or similar transparency) design, and meet the stated offset condition from the property line so the town can maintain visibility requirements.

Staff advised Heffernan that if he modifies the fencing or parking footprint beyond what was approved, he may need to return with revised plans; otherwise, the applicant may proceed to obtain building permits and construct the fence under the board’s conditions.

The board’s decision preserves a path for the resident to add a safety barrier while maintaining the city’s visual standards for front-yard fences.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee