Secretary of State outlines election-related duties in SB 851 and seeks funding for voting system standards, Cal-Access replacement
May 07, 2026 | California State Senate, Senate, Legislative, California
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Secretary of State 27s office briefed Subcommittee 4 on SB 851 implementation, voting system standards work and technology projects to replace aging systems.
Kristen Dagscher, interim chief financial officer for the Secretary of State, said SB 851 would require the office to receive notice within three days of certain elections-related court actions and before settlements, expand the SOS 27s authority to publish voting system standards aligned with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), and require vendors to notify the office of voting-system defects. She said the request includes $1.1 million in ongoing general fund to support four permanent positions and litigation-tracking software to meet the statutory requirements.
Department legal staff told the committee they are coordinating with the Attorney General and county election officials and cited ongoing uncertainty about the scope of litigation and federal developments. "We are working closely with our AG counterparts, and county election officials and all of our local partners to make sure that we're apprised of everything going on," Janelle Callahan, the department 27s legal affairs staffer, said.
On technology, the SOS requested $11.8 million in one-time funds to continue the CARS project (the Cal-Access replacement) to support final months of execution, initial maintenance and the 33 previously approved positions. John Heinlein, assistant CARS project director, said the project plans a November 2026 go-live for this iteration and emphasized stakeholder engagement and a three-month stabilization period after launch.
The department also requested nearly $9.8 million in business fees fund to continue NAP2 (notary automation) replacement because the current system is obsolete and running on unsupported technology.
The subcommittee held the items open while members asked about staffing, the expiration of federal HAVA funds and whether the requested positions and procurement timing are sufficient to meet implementation timelines.
Kristen Dagscher, interim chief financial officer for the Secretary of State, said SB 851 would require the office to receive notice within three days of certain elections-related court actions and before settlements, expand the SOS 27s authority to publish voting system standards aligned with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), and require vendors to notify the office of voting-system defects. She said the request includes $1.1 million in ongoing general fund to support four permanent positions and litigation-tracking software to meet the statutory requirements.
Department legal staff told the committee they are coordinating with the Attorney General and county election officials and cited ongoing uncertainty about the scope of litigation and federal developments. "We are working closely with our AG counterparts, and county election officials and all of our local partners to make sure that we're apprised of everything going on," Janelle Callahan, the department 27s legal affairs staffer, said.
On technology, the SOS requested $11.8 million in one-time funds to continue the CARS project (the Cal-Access replacement) to support final months of execution, initial maintenance and the 33 previously approved positions. John Heinlein, assistant CARS project director, said the project plans a November 2026 go-live for this iteration and emphasized stakeholder engagement and a three-month stabilization period after launch.
The department also requested nearly $9.8 million in business fees fund to continue NAP2 (notary automation) replacement because the current system is obsolete and running on unsupported technology.
The subcommittee held the items open while members asked about staffing, the expiration of federal HAVA funds and whether the requested positions and procurement timing are sufficient to meet implementation timelines.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
