Shelley says Community Eligibility Provision would reduce Upper Adams SD revenue

Shelley, a district finance staff member, told the Upper Adams School District committee that an analysis of the Community Eligibility Provision shows the district would likely receive less cafeteria revenue under CEP than under the current meal-application system. "It would not benefit UASD to be in the CEP program," Shelley said, citing October 2025 snapshot data and prior-year actuals.

Shelley explained the CEP calculation relies on the Identified Student Percentage (ISP) and a federal 1.6 multiplier applied to qualifying meals. UASD's ISP was about 39.7 in 2022-23 and 37.91 in 2025-26, below commonly cited break-even thresholds. Using October 2025 figures, Shelley said the district's cafeteria income would have fallen from about $30,000 (without CEP in 2023) to roughly $14,000 under CEP; the October comparison showed an estimated $19,000 without CEP, while a CEP election would have reduced receipts.

The presentation also flagged programmatic trade-offs: converting to CEP removes individual free-and-reduced applications used for Title funding and some fee-waiver eligibility. "It could impact Title funding because Title funding is looking at our free and reduced applications," Shelley said, warning that participation changes under CEP could have downstream effects on students' test-fee waivers and program eligibility.

Board members pressed for numeric clarity on the multiplier and thresholds. One member summarized the math question and noted that CEP becomes more financially attractive as ISP approaches higher levels; Shelley reiterated that CEP typically benefits districts with ISPs of roughly 60 or greater and cautioned about committing to CEP for four years if ISP declines.

Shelley also noted that breakfasts have been free districtwide since 2023-24 and that breakfast participation has remained steady; the primary CEP impact would be on lunch reimbursements and administrative processes, not on breakfast access.

The committee did not adopt a formal motion on CEP during the meeting; members asked staff to keep the data and community context under review as they consider meal-policy options and the budget outlook.

The committee scheduled no immediate policy change; staff indicated they would continue to provide data and would revisit CEP only if shifting ISP or other program factors made it advantageous.