District staff presented the annual Student Progression Plan update for 2026-27 on May 4, noting the revisions are largely statute-driven and procedural.
Francis, who presented the item, said several edits are non-substantive (correcting assessment names such as WIDA and STAR/FAST PM) and that the state's removal of the former "certificate of completion" requires the district to create a "high school credit completion award" for students who meet credit/GPA but not assessment requirements. "So really, all that changed is the name," Francis said, describing the adjustment as administrative.
More substantive discussion focused on grading and redo policies. The draft adds a uniform parameter for daily late work (maximum 10% grade reduction per day not turned in) and expands long-term assignment language to align parameters across grade levels. The plan requires departments and administrative teams to define local "best practices" for redo opportunities, with the intention that administrators will sign off and help standardize expectations.
Board members raised concerns about potential inconsistency across schools and grade bands, the feasibility of providing relearning opportunities near grading deadlines, and supports for chronic non-completers. Staff said grade-change procedures and intervention processes (attendance teams, counselor supports, NTSS processes) will be used alongside the redo approach.
Why it matters: Changes affect grading, promotion and remediation practices across the district. The plan aims to balance a consistent district framework with school- and department-level flexibility.
Next steps: The Student Progression Plan will return to the board for formal adoption after additional refinement and as state guidance (including any new statute changes) is finalized.