A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Council adopts Flying Fortress Parkway construction standards and approves assessment approach for Phase 2

May 06, 2026 | Kingman City, Mohave County, Arizona


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council adopts Flying Fortress Parkway construction standards and approves assessment approach for Phase 2
The Kingman City Council voted May 5 to adopt Ordinance 19‑98, a staff‑proposed ordinance that sets construction and access standards for the future widening of Flying Fortress Parkway aimed at limiting vehicular conflict points and allowing synchronized signal progression. Robert, a city project lead, told the council the ordinance seeks half‑mile spacing between major signalized intersections and to limit driveway access; he summarized the goal as avoiding the traffic and access problems seen on Stockton Hill Road.

Councilors discussed possible clarifying language regarding left‑turn lanes and medians; staff indicated such language could be added and returned for council consideration if council requested. After discussion the ordinance was approved by a voice vote.

The council also considered a separate but related public‑improvements assessment for Flying Fortress Parkway Phase 2. Staff presented three assessment methodologies: (1) full‑project frontage allocation; (2) area-based allocation within a half‑mile band; and (3) a frontage-based approach excluding parcels south of Grand Canyon Road (a concession tied to prior ADOT project limits). Councilors expressed concern for fairness to small landowners and favored option 3 as a compromise. Council adopted that approach, which reduces assessment exposure for properties at the south end while keeping the city’s net cost roughly neutral relative to the ADOT change‑order scenario because of how ADOT cost responsibilities were negotiated.

Council members said choosing the option was a tradeoff between equitably distributing costs and facilitating development of a key industrial/commercial corridor. Vice Mayor Samaly said option 3 was a “good compromise” that protected smaller parcels while recognizing the interchange work’s role in making the area developable.

The ordinance and assessment decision set the technical standards for future development along Flying Fortress Parkway and established how preliminary assessment liabilities will be calculated if properties develop within the 10‑year assessment window. Staff said the city intends to construct the Parkway in concrete for long‑term durability and that final assessments will be determined after construction and if parcels develop.

Sources: Staff presentation by Robert and council discussion at the May 5, 2026 Kingman City Council meeting.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee