A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

House Appropriations Committee advances a package of bills; key votes and amendments recorded

May 01, 2026 | 2026 Legislature CO, Colorado


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House Appropriations Committee advances a package of bills; key votes and amendments recorded
The Colorado House Committee on Appropriations met and advanced a series of bills to the Committee of the Whole after debates over amendments, rules, and fiscal impacts.

The panel began with routine business and roll call before moving House Bill 1004 without amendment. The committee then considered House Bill 1065, which creates a new cash fund with a continuous appropriation; members raised concerns about oversight and out-year cumulative impacts, adopted amendment J001, and approved the bill 9–2 on a roll-call vote.

Senate Bill 141 was favorably recommended and passed the committee 10–1 but was later laid over to a future date for further amendment analysis. The committee repeatedly flagged continuous spending authority across several bills and discussed adding reporting requirements as an accountability measure.

On transportation-network company rules in House Bill 1043, sponsors said the bill formalizes a reporting process when rides are denied to people with service animals and allows remedial steps before the Public Utilities Commission issues fines. Members questioned allergy accommodations and user-interface design for driver reporting; HB1043 was advanced 9–2.

House Bill 1054 drew extended discussion. Representative Velasco and sponsors described three amendments (L009, L010, L012) that transfer rulemaking and a workplace health-and-safety fund from the Department of Labor to the Attorney General’s Office and give the AG investigatory and enforcement authority. Ms. Phoebe Connergrano, a JBC staffer, explained that if costs arise they would appear as a future budget request; sponsors said the AG indicated it could absorb initial costs. The amendments were adopted by roll calls and the bill passed to the Committee of the Whole 8–3.

The committee also approved House Bill 1059, consolidating multiple Department of Revenue cost-recovery cash funds into one fund for administrative efficiency, adopting a reporting amendment (L001) and passing the bill unanimously. Sponsors said the consolidation is intended to streamline accounting and reduce administrative burden.

Other notable actions: HB1111 (a mobile agricultural-chemical disposal program) was discussed at length with sponsors describing mobile collection events for rural areas; HB1117 (temporary cannabis hospitality permits) was amended to remove duplicative enforcement and passed 7–4 before being laid over for further fiscal analysis; HB1289 (tax code clean-up) received many technical amendments related to tax credits, safe-haven (tax-haven) lists, and an earned-income-tax-credit expansion; SB35 (a 'super-speeder' bill) was amended to align thresholds with existing programming and advanced 8–3.

Votes at a glance (selected results recorded on the floor):
- HB1004: moved to Committee of the Whole — unanimous
- HB1065 (as amended/J001): moved to Committee of the Whole — 9 yes, 2 no
- SB141: moved to Committee of the Whole — 10 yes, 1 no (later laid over)
- HB1043: moved to Committee of the Whole — 9 yes, 2 no
- HB1054 (as amended/L009,L010,L012): moved to Committee of the Whole — 8 yes, 3 no
- HB1059 (with L001 reporting): moved to Committee of the Whole — unanimous
- HB1117 (L009 adopted): moved to Committee of the Whole — 7 yes, 4 no (laid over for fiscal review)
- HB1289 (multiple L/J amendments): moved to Committee of the Whole — 8 yes, 3 no
- SB35 (L011 adopted): moved to Committee of the Whole — 8 yes, 3 no

Committee members repeatedly requested clearer reporting on continuous appropriations and asked sponsors to provide fiscal details for conditional costs; JBC staff and the fiscal analyst Greg Sobetsky said conditional costs would be the basis for future budget requests if triggered. Chair closed the session noting the committee may meet again later in the day.

Quotes from the hearing:
- "We will actually be starting with 10:04…" — Chair, opening the agenda.
- "Continuous spending authority has been the approach to ensure funding is available throughout the many challenges that one might face in financing a project." — committee member (concerning continuous appropriations).
- "This amendment puts the workplace health and safety fund in the attorney general's office." — Representative Velasco, describing L010.
- "In this case, because the fiscal impact is conditional, it would be up for the Department of Law to come in with a budget request at the time OSHA is eliminated to request any funding that they need." — Phoebe Connergrano, JBC staff.

The committee adjourned after moving the day's calendar items to the Committee of the Whole and noting some bills would be laid over for more analysis.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee