The San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors amended the county's recommended distribution of Homeless Assistance and Prevention (HAP) funding on May 21 after hours of public comment and a staff briefing on the limited pool of available money.
The board took up item 29 after a string of service providers and local officials urged changes to preserve shelter capacity. Devin Drake, the county's director of social services, told the board that staff received more than $20 million in requests against roughly $4 million available for this funding cycle, and that a review committee and HSOC (Homeless Services Oversight Council) had produced recommendations to prioritize system‑wide goals.
"We received numerous responses, as mentioned earlier in some of the comments, over $20,000,000 worth," Drake said, describing the RFP process and the committee review that produced HSOC's proposal.
Supervisor John Paulding proposed targeted adjustments to keep the county's largest shelter operator whole for the coming cycle. Paulding moved to shift $100,000 from a migrant‑focused rental assistance line, $100,000 from a project called Path Forward, and $200,000 from an SB 1090 Homekey contribution into the allocation for CAPSLO's 40 Prado shelter so it would not have to reduce beds and daytime services. The motion was seconded and adopted by roll call.
Supporters who testified before the vote, including Whitney McDonald, interim city manager for San Luis Obispo, and Lauren Ramos of CAPSLO, pushed the board to prioritize ongoing operations and the continuum of care. McDonald told supervisors the allocation process should reflect where demand and services are concentrated, arguing that a flat geographic split was inequitable: "...we're the county seat. We are the location where the majority of services are provided...by splitting things equally, they actually are not equitable," she said.
Board members stressed the need for clearer funding criteria moving forward. The Homeless Services Division will work with HSOC's executive committee to develop more explicit performance metrics, cost‑of‑service information and a timeline for regular updates to the board. Staff said the county will return with recommended performance metrics and a process for weighing operational sustainability against start‑up projects.
Outcome: The board approved amended HAP funding recommendations and authorized staff to execute related documents as amended.
What happens next: Staff will present a plan for how HSOC will incorporate performance and cost metrics into future funding recommendations and return to the board in follow‑up reports, per the board's direction.