A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Athletic training contract would rise to $75,000 next year; committee backs one‑year extension while exploring bids

April 28, 2026 | Lisle CUSD 202, School Boards, Illinois


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Athletic training contract would rise to $75,000 next year; committee backs one‑year extension while exploring bids
Officials told the finance committee on April 27 that athletic training services at Lisle High School — currently provided by the Illinois Bone and Joint Institute — have become more expensive and that the provider offered a renewal at $75,000 for a first year and $80,000 if a mutually agreed second year is exercised.

"The first year would be at $75,000...and then if we want to do a second year with them, that would be $80,000," Dave Wilkinson said, explaining the prior three‑year agreement had been about $50,000 annually and that vendors have shown limited interest in recent procurements. He said the district put a bid on the shelf but is uncertain whether other bidders would respond.

Committee members discussed alternatives: immediately bidding the contract (risking no bidders or a single, high bid), renewing for one year to maintain coverage and re‑competing in winter, or hiring an in‑house trainer. Administration estimated bringing the service in house would likely cost at least about $70,000 and possibly closer to $90,000 once salary and benefits and coverage needs were included; members noted Lisle’s small size makes consistent coverage with a single in‑house trainer difficult.

Several members voiced support for the administration’s recommendation to secure coverage for the coming year and survey other districts before committing to a second year. Wilkinson said he would bring the agreement forward for board approval in May if the committee was comfortable with the one‑year approach.

No formal contract vote was taken in committee; the direction was a consensus to pursue the one‑year renewal while preparing to bid if market responses warrant it.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee