A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

DNREC frames nuclear as one option to address rising demand and grid stress

April 20, 2026 | 2026 Legislature DE, Legislative, Delaware


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

DNREC frames nuclear as one option to address rising demand and grid stress
State energy officials told Delaware’s Energy Task Force on April 20 that small modular reactors are worth evaluating as one tool to address rising electricity demand, but members pressed for clearer cost comparisons and for a regional planning lens.

Tom Noyes, administrator at the DNREC State Energy Office, told senators, representatives and task‑force members that the state’s 2024 State Energy Plan directs agencies to “closely monitor” SMR development and that Governor’s Executive Order No. 18 directs agencies to establish a coordinated permitting process for priority energy projects, including nuclear.

Noyes said Delaware’s summer peak is roughly 2,700 megawatts and annual in‑state generation is on the order of 12–13 million megawatt‑hours. He noted more than 10,000 behind‑the‑meter rooftop solar installations are not fully visible to PJM and flagged data‑center proposals as a major wildcard for future load projections.

Why it matters: task‑force members said the state must weigh the tradeoffs between higher short‑term procurement costs and the value of firm, dispatchable power to support electrification and avoid curtailments in the DPL/PJM zone.

Members asked for concrete price benchmarks. One outside presenter’s current market ask was cited as roughly $130 per megawatt‑hour for an early SMR PPA; Jamieson pointed to recent standard‑offer auction clearing prices around $100/MWh (including capacity) as a current benchmark. "We need to understand the delta between what we currently pay and what we might be tying ratepayers to," a legislator said during Q&A.

Task‑force members also raised procurement structure and risk allocation: whether a single utility’s customers should bear exclusive cost, or whether costs should be spread across all ratepayers if the resource benefits the broader state. Matt Hartigan of the Public Service Commission urged that procurement design consider who pays and that ratepayer allocation not unduly favor one customer class.

What’s next: DNREC committed to provide more granular PJM/DPL zone data and megawatt‑level figures to the task force after the meeting. The task force will begin module 5 on May 4, with further analysis on costs and procurement structure to be developed for the group’s recommendations.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee