Senator Marchman introduced House Bill 12-83 as a straightforward worker-protection measure that would criminalize employers' confiscation or retention of an employee's government-issued identification. "Can an employer take your ID and hold on to it?" he asked the committee, then answered: "No."
Sponsor Senator Benavides told the committee the bill raises civil remedies and can increase penalties — for example, when an employer weaponizes immigration threats — and that the measure protects vulnerable workers from being trapped in exploitative situations. "When a person loses access to their ID they lose access to everything attached to it," he said.
Owen Brigner of the Colorado Municipal League testified in an "amended neutral" position after sponsors adjusted the draft to ensure the bill's employment nexus did not unintentionally capture municipal workers performing nonemployment functions. Michael Neal of Colorado People's Alliance urged passage, while witnesses raised a range of specifics about the acceptable time an employer could hold a document; the sponsors and advocates discussed compromise language (amendment L24) and adopted it without objection.
The committee adopted L24 to narrow the definition of "individual" covered and then moved HB 12-83 to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation.