A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

County reviews $92,000 design proposal for 2026 road maintenance program

April 20, 2026 | Duchesne County Commission, Duchesne County Boards and Commissions, Duchesne County, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County reviews $92,000 design proposal for 2026 road maintenance program
Jeff Baker, an engineer with Jones and Veil Engineering, told the Duchesne County Commission the firm had revised a proposal to support the county's 2026 road maintenance program, proposing a $92,000 package to assess roads and prepare plan documents and bid specifications and an estimated $105,000 construction-services allowance for on-site contractor observation.

Baker said the $92,000 covers assessment, design, the bid packages and contract documents, while the $105,000 figure represents an hourly contract and an estimated total for construction-phase services that would be billed for actual time on site. "So the 92 is like us doing all the assessments and the bidding and the plan documents specs," Baker said, and he added that the construction services fee "is an hourly contract, so we would just bill you for whatever time you're actually out there." (Jeff Baker)

Commissioners and staff asked a series of clarifying questions about scope and timing. Baker noted that striping and an Eastern Road chip-seal project had already been approved and that paving work would be advertised and bid later in the year. He also described a planned emulsions procurement to ensure the county can obtain chip-seal oil and outlined typical assessment tasks: pothole patching, crack seal estimation and quantity checks for chip-seal sections.

Commissioners discussed right-of-way easements in Roosevelt City that must be finalized before some projects proceed and asked staff to continue coordinating permitting, including any Army Corps of Engineers reviews for areas with potential wetland or land issues. Staff said they would advertise projects as permitting and easements are resolved.

Next steps: Commissioners did not take a formal vote on Baker's proposal during the presentation; staff were directed to continue coordinating scope and scheduling and to return with recommended contract documents and a formal recommendation for procurement.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee