The Fremont Charter Advisory Committee on April 13 voted to narrow its work to a council‑manager form of government and, after further discussion, recommended that the city pursue that form via a charter measure. The committee’s motion to concentrate its deliberations on the council‑manager structure passed unanimously; a subsequent motion to recommend a council‑manager charter passed 4–3.
City Attorney Alvarado told the committee the council‑manager option is compatible with either general‑law status or a charter and that a charter can grant additional local authorities in areas such as contracting or revenue measures. Committee member Duane Absen, who supported the charter approach, said, “I’m more aligned towards the council manager with the charter,” arguing a charter provides more local control while remaining subject to voter approval.
Opponents cautioned that some policy areas—particularly housing—are tightly constrained by state law and would not be solved solely by moving to charter status. During debate, members also discussed whether the mayor should be designated full time in charter language; the attorney explained that designating a mayor as a full‑time executive is a choice a charter can make but that compensation and powers are distinct questions.
The committee directed staff to prepare draft language reflecting the committee’s guidance and to bring back more detailed comparisons of appointment authority, meeting structure and voting options at future meetings. The committee’s recommendation will be reported to the city council along with areas where the committee did not reach unanimous agreement.
The vote on recommending a council‑manager charter recorded four yes votes (members Dwan, Kuang, Yi and Marshall) and three no votes (Hatton, Jones and Sankaran). The committee also left open the technical question of which specific charter authorities to include—directing staff to prepare options for the committee’s next meetings.