A motion to cap the delegation adviser's pay at $6,000 a year sparked debate April 20 about how the delegation and its executive committee handled recent pay increases for elected officials and staff.
One commissioner moved to cap the adviser position's historical pay at $6,000 and criticized what the speaker described as orchestrated raises for selected officials. "I've been deeply disturbed by the executive committee of the delegation... I think you deserve a pay raise, but in an orchestrated step way... I would like to cap him with a historical amount of $6,000 a year as the [delegation] adviser," the commissioner said.
Commissioners disagreed on whether the executive committee had authority to set compensation without full delegation ratification. Several raised concerns about whether raises included changes to benefits and time‑off and requested a legal review. "That's one thing to say; it's another thing ... is it legal? That's, I guess, the question that's trying to be answered," one commissioner said. Another asked whether the delegation had voted to give its executive committee authority; board members said that while delegation actions may have delegated some authority, the legal sufficiency needed confirmation from counsel.
The motion was moved and seconded and drew a mix of votes and commentary on next steps; commissioners asked staff and legal counsel to follow up so the board can assess whether raises and benefit changes were properly authorized.
Board members said they would await formal legal guidance and possible delegation responses before taking further action.