City staff opened an informational work session at the April 16 meeting to review at‑large versus ward‑based council representation and potential hybrid models.
The presenter (staff) described at‑large systems (all seats elected citywide) and ward systems (the city divided into geographic wards, each electing one representative), along with hybrid possibilities. Staff explained two legal pathways to change the system — a council‑initiated ordinance or a citizen petition — and said a council‑initiated ordinance would require population data, a ward plan and public hearings before adoption. Staff emphasized the need for an effective date in any ordinance to avoid unintentionally shortening or lengthening incumbent terms.
Council members raised implementation issues including staggering terms when converting, the effects of annexation or future population shifts, potential candidate shortages in small wards, the risk of gerrymandering and timing relative to election cycles. Several council members suggested collecting data on surrounding cities’ approaches and preparing draft maps, while others recommended community engagement before pursuing change. Staff repeatedly noted no decision would be made tonight; the session was intended to educate and inform possible future action.
Next steps: council asked staff to gather examples of neighboring jurisdictions’ systems and return with additional information if they wish to pursue an ordinance or ballot placement in a future election cycle.