A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commission approves CEA to reimburse developer for I‑49 interchange work in 11–1 vote

April 10, 2026 | Caddo Parish, Louisiana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission approves CEA to reimburse developer for I‑49 interchange work in 11–1 vote
The Caddo Parish Commission on April 9 voted 11–1 to approve resolution 29, authorizing the execution of a cooperative endeavor agreement (CEA) to reimburse Edgemont Holdings LLC for infrastructure improvements for a travel center project at the I‑49/LA‑2 interchange.

Stormy Gage Watts, who moved the resolution, and administration staff described the action as a follow‑up to a prior decision to enact a sales tax within the I‑49 TIF district. Under the plan described to commissioners, additional sales tax collections generated by the district would be used to reimburse the developer for work on a road that benefits the TIF area; collections have been held pending execution of the agreements.

Administration told commissioners the sales tax collections had been authorized in a prior vote and that the current resolution is intended to "close the loop" and put cooperative‑agreement language in place to permit reimbursements.

The vote carried with 11 in favor and 1 opposed. Commissioners later considered and adopted related resolution 1, acting in the commission’s capacity as the governing authority for the I‑49 North Corridor Economic Development District; that motion carried 10–1 with one commissioner recorded as out of the chamber at the time of the vote.

Supporters said the measures finalize prior policy decisions and enable the parish to reimburse infrastructure work performed to serve the TIF district. Opponents raised procedural questions about state involvement and the broader trend of shifting local control to state actors, but administration characterized the action as routine contract‑execution work to implement previously authorized tax collections.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee