Task force backs a permanent advisory body to monitor AI; members debate placement and funding

Yuki Ishizuka (senior policy analyst, Attorney General's Office) presented the task force’s statutory charge to recommend whether a standing body should continue evaluating AI impacts. The proposal envisions an advisory, research‑oriented body to provide expertise to lawmakers and underresourced agencies.

Members favored an advisory model rather than a full oversight agency. Katie Rocco and others noted Washington Technology Solutions (WATEC) already performs related work for state agencies and suggested interagency or temporary hosting arrangements; several members said the Attorney General's Office could continue to provide policy support in the near term. Funding was a frequent concern — task force members said a permanent, funded body would be desirable but may require a future budget appropriation.

The task force asked subcommittees to refine the body’s mission and recommend whether it should be advisory or carry oversight authority, and where it would best be housed (AGO, WATEC, Commerce or another entity). The recommendation will be carried forward to the April 24 meeting for a vote and the final report.