After adjourning into closed session, the council reconvened and received two staff updates. City staff reported that the applicant for a project at 242 East Ohio Avenue agreed to submit the municipal‑code applications necessary for use of an arcade plaza at that site.
On a separate legal matter, council members instructed staff to coordinate with outside counsel representing a coalition of local governments to consider participation—in pro bono form and limited to filings such as amicus briefs or declarations—in Vasquez Perdomo v. Noam, a federal case involving immigration and Customs and Border Patrol matters. Staff noted any city involvement would be handled pro bono by that legal team.
No formal direction was given on permit or zoning policy at the meeting; staff characterized the closed‑session report as an informational update and said no final action was taken during the closed session.
The council returned to the public workshop without voting on the ordinance or on litigation participation; staff will pursue any required follow‑up consistent with council direction.