A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Abutters ask Candia Select Board to explore negotiated purchase to keep small town parcels out of auction; board asks counsel to review title and liability

March 08, 2025 | Candia BOS Audio, Candia, Rockingham County, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Abutters ask Candia Select Board to explore negotiated purchase to keep small town parcels out of auction; board asks counsel to review title and liability
The Candia Select Board opened a public hearing Sept. 8 to gather comment on offering nine town-owned parcels deemed surplus; the parcels are part of a larger review in which several properties had been removed from the list because they were reserved for conservation.

Resident and abutter Matt Phillips (speaker 10) and others representing the Georges proposed an alternative to auction under RSA 8080. They asked the board to find that a negotiated sale—where abutters pay back taxes and interest, fund required surveys and assume liability for any subsequent claims—could preserve contiguous open space and avoid costly title work for the town. Phillips said the group would pay the calculated back taxes and interest, fund a survey to resolve a mis-mapped lot, and, if necessary, pursue quiet-title actions so the town would not bear the cost or legal exposure.

Town advisors and the auctioneer cautioned that several parcels have unclear or unmarketable title and that selling properties without clear ownership could expose the town to litigation. The auctioneer told the board that title research is needed and that surplus proceeds above taxes/interest can trigger interpleader obligations to find heirs. The board agreed conceptually that the abutters’ approach "sounds like a good idea if it all works out," but stressed that the town will not fund surveys or assume liability. The board directed staff to summarize the facts and send the file to town counsel for legal advice on RSA 8080 options and title risk.

Why it matters: the board’s handling of surplus properties affects potential conservation outcomes, the town’s exposure to legal claims over title, and whether small parcels are returned to productive tax rolls. Several parcels were described as wetlands or inaccessible/discontinued-road parcels; abutters argued consolidation would preserve open space and reduce administrative burden.

What’s next: the board will request counsel review of RSA 8080 and title issues before proceeding. A second public hearing on the auction process was scheduled for the board’s next meeting (listed in the meeting materials as Sept. 23). The board also noted the auctioneer may pursue additional research on other parcels before any sale.

Representative quotes and context are drawn from public comment and board discussion during the hearing.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee