Residents urge equitable local investment and question tax abatements and developer ties during budget hearing

Multiple residents and callers used the Committee of the Whole's public-comment period to press the council for more equitable neighborhood investment and to question both tax abatements and the city's relationships with development nonprofits.

"Study after study, every study that's been done independently or with academic rigor suggests that tax abatements have a net negative impact on cities," public commenter Maurice Weeks told the council, and he offered to provide several academic studies to members. Weeks said many companies that receive subsidies would have opened or relocated regardless of incentives.

Betty A. Barnard, identifying herself as president of a local association, said residents in the Finger Corridor in District 2 want the same level of money and attention that has gone to corridors such as Grand River and Midtown. "We want the same monies to be spent in our area," she said, urging parity in corridor investment.

Tyson Gersh asked council members to probe the structure of the Detroit Economic Growth Corporation and its subsidiary and questioned whether donations from developers and overlapping leadership create conflicts of interest. "How was that not a conflict of interest?" he asked, referencing Conrad Mallett in his comments.

Other callers said downtown-generated funds should be spread more broadly across neighborhoods. William M. Davis urged planning to better support neighborhood development and warned that too many dollars "are staying downtown." Owner Papa and other callers said planning must include residents in early stages rather than presenting plans after decisions are made.

Tahira Ahmed called for more investment in home businesses and home-repair programs that support disabled residents and people who faced foreclosure. A final caller, introduced by staff as Marie/Margaret Maddox Scarlett, asked the council to ensure plans incorporate universal design and disability access.

No council responses to those public comments are recorded in this portion of the transcript; the council recessed and planned to reconvene for the afternoon session.