A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee hears calls to modernize charter's legal‑notice language to ensure public access

March 30, 2026 | Everett, Snohomish County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears calls to modernize charter's legal‑notice language to ensure public access
At the first public hearing of Everett’s Charter Review Committee, residents and committee members probed whether the charter's requirement to publish legal notices in a "city official newspaper" remains appropriate or practical in an era of declining print circulation.

"The charter needs to show how things are actually being done at the moment," Alice Hedges told the committee, urging language that reflects current digital practices and preserves public access without creating legal vulnerabilities.

Speakers said the existing charter language — which specifies publication in a local newspaper — risks leaving the city without a reliable official channel if a paper folds or moves behind a paywall. A former city employee on the committee recounted the historical practice of placing legal notices in multiple papers and even sending items to radio stations, and warned of potentially high costs for print publication.

Committee members discussed possible solutions: broaden the charter's wording to require publication in a city‑controlled online location and other places the city deems appropriate; add durable language that survives changes in communications technology; or retain the newspaper requirement as a minimum standard alongside city publication. A committee member suggested requiring the council to read legal notices at regular meetings as an additional redundancy.

Jennifer Gregerson, the city liaison, said staff will propose language that balances legal sufficiency, cost and long‑term public access, and emphasized the committee should consider durable phrasing given the charter's permanence.

The committee did not adopt any language at the hearing. Members asked staff to compile options and legal analysis for future consideration and to present opportunities for public comment ahead of any formal recommendation.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee