Senate Majority Leader Jamie Peterson said a proposed data-center tax-break bill "didn't have enough votes" to advance through the legislature this session, and he pointed to concerns raised by building trades and utility impacts as central to members’ hesitancy.
Peterson said members and stakeholders spent the final day talking through the measure. "We did not think after Tuesday night that we would have the time to talk through that bill with people, and we did," he said, describing extended negotiations to try to secure support.
Why it matters: Data centers raise trade-offs the transcript highlights — increased electricity and water consumption, environmental impacts, and local ratepayer effects — that lawmakers said they must balance against job and construction interests. Peterson said building trades and the IBEW were particularly sensitive to any move perceived to reduce construction or electrical work availability.
Stakeholder positions in the record: The transcript records that businesses operating data centers and construction-trade stakeholders urged caution so regulation would not "shut off" the industry, while committee-level comments flagged labor concerns (for example, IBEW Local 46 members reportedly saw many members on the bench). When asked about pushback from Amazon and other tech companies, a committee respondent said testimony existed in Ways and Means but was "not extraordinary." The transcript does not include formal testimony transcripts, bill text, or recorded vote counts.
What’s next: Leaders said data centers will remain a focus in the interim and are likely to resurface in future sessions as lawmakers seek to reconcile environmental and economic goals.
Ending: The legislature adjourned without advancing the data-center tax-break measure this session; the transcript attributes the setback primarily to insufficient votes and to labor and resource-consumption concerns rather than to extraordinary private-sector lobbying in this account.