A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Delray Beach magistrate sets compliance deadlines across multiple code cases; fines and continuances ordered

April 03, 2026 | Delray Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Delray Beach magistrate sets compliance deadlines across multiple code cases; fines and continuances ordered
The Code Enforcement Special Magistrate for the City of Delray Beach heard a docket of property cases on April 2 and issued a series of orders requiring property owners to obtain permits or correct violations within set timeframes or face daily fines.

Key outcomes:

- Issa Mesa (737 SW 20th Ct.): Staff reported permits were issued and the case is in compliance; no further order was issued at today's status check.

- 2402 Seacrest Development Partners LLC (pickleball court): Officer Jude Mackey said the property installed a new pickleball court without permits after a neighbor complaint. The city requested 30 more days to secure compliance; magistrate granted 30 days and set a $100-per-day potential fine if not corrected.

- Pots and Pans 1 LLC (180 SW 5th Ave.): Photos showed an unpermitted fence. Counsel Willard Roberts confirmed a permit application filed April 1; magistrate ordered 60 days for compliance or a $100-per-day fine.

- Kenneth Bigasse Jr. & Michael Sunzien (138 SW 5th Ave.): City found an unpermitted fence; magistrate ordered 30 days to comply or up to $500 per day may be imposed.

- 14987 Whatley Road (landscape maintenance): Officer Joseph Oliva said the property has overgrowth and debris; magistrate ordered 15 days to correct or $100/day may issue.

- 1006 Brooks Lane (unkempt construction site): Latoya Thompson asked for 10 days to clean and mow; Stomp Development COO Vinny Biasiello said cleanup had begun. Magistrate ordered 10 days to comply or a $200/day fine may issue.

- 240 SE 10th Street (multifamily lighting): Staff explained the awnings/lighting issue at a multifamily property requires a photometric plan and site-plan modification review; staff requested time to coordinate and the magistrate reset/continued the matter to allow review.

Magistrate orders were mostly time-limited (10–60 days) and specified daily fines for noncompliance, commonly $100/day. Staff were directed to follow up with property owners and provide guidance on permits and next steps.

The hearing concluded with the magistrate adjourning the meeting; staff will update dockets as compliance or enforcement actions proceed.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee