During a City of Birmingham council training exercise, a resolution to consider an off‑premise beer‑and‑wine license for AMA Quick Stop (803 24th Avenue NW) drew a public comment from a neighboring resident who urged the council to deny the license.
Jeff McDaniels, a resident who identified himself and said he lives across the street from the store, told the council he opposed granting the license because "kids go into the convenience store and the first thing that they see is alcohol." He described seeing single‑serve canned alcohol prominently displayed, and asked councilors to vote against the application.
The training moderator explained public‑hearing procedure (three‑minute speeches, lining speakers pro/con) and gave Mr. McDaniels his time. The resolution's sponsor moved the item and it received a second during the exercise; after the hearing the trainer announced the item as approved in the role play.
The transcript records the resident's objection but contains no direct rebuttal from the license applicant or a recorded council response addressing the specific child‑safety claim. The item was processed as part of the exercise and recorded as approved; because this session was a simulation, this outcome does not substitute for an official council decision.
If council staff or public‑safety officials wish to follow up, they would typically check the licensing application record for conditions, look for compliance with state/local alcohol rules, and consider placement or display restrictions as part of license terms.