Mayor Martha Dame and councilors spent more than an hour Wednesday questioning members of the Charter Commission and staff before moving forward with targeted changes to the city charter.
Charlie Willman, who chaired the citizen commission that reviewed the charter, told the council the group worked section by section to modernize language and fix inconsistencies in a charter that has not been substantially updated since the 1960s. The commission highlighted several topics for possible voter consideration, including whether to elect the mayor, whether to move municipal elections from the spring to November, at-large council seats and increasing the dollar threshold that triggers a formal procurement bid process.
Councilors and the city attorney confirmed that any charter change would require approval by voters. City Attorney Carl said technical cleanups could be grouped into digestible ballot questions so voters understand what is changing; larger structural items — such as an elected mayor or at-large seats — would merit more public hearings and time for debate.
Councilor Schachter moved to advance a procurement-threshold update and a bundle of technical cleanups to be refined by staff and the Charter Commission for possible placement on a future ballot. A proposed amendment to add a change in the council vacancy-replacement process was brought as a subsequent main motion but failed. The main motion to move procurement and limited technical edits forward passed unanimously.
Why it matters: The procurement change the commission suggested is intended to update a small, outdated dollar threshold that staff say increases efficiency and may save the city money by reducing unnecessary bidding for small purchases. Moving forward with a narrow, well‑explained ballot question was the council’s preferred way to seek voter approval without combining too many substantive changes into a single, potentially confusing measure.
What’s next: Staff and the Charter Commission will draft clearer ballot language and public outreach materials; councilors indicated they want public input sessions if larger structural items are later pursued. Because charter amendments require an election, the council must also consider timing and ballot placement if it decides to pursue additional changes.