House Education Committee hears competing views on research security and campus transparency

Chairman Glenn ‘Pete’ Wahlberg opened the hearing saying U.S. research universities are “entrusted with hundreds of billions in taxpayer funding” and framing the session as oversight of foreign influence and compliance with section 117 of the Higher Education Act and the Deterrent Act.

University presidents and research-security officers described steps taken to safeguard research while members sparred over whether the committee’s emphasis risks stereotyping international students. Domenico Grasso, interim president of the University of Michigan, told the committee Michigan has expanded background checks, strengthened data and physical security, and tightened oversight of international collaborations: “We are meeting the increased threat with increased security.” He said isolated incidents occurred without university knowledge and that the university severed a relationship with a Chinese partner after discussions with congressional committees.

Cassandra Farley, senior director for research integrity, security and compliance at the University of Florida, described a centralized research-security program that screens all new research hires, reviews international agreements regardless of funding source, requires travel approvals, and mandates annual research-security training tied to the CHIPS and Science Act. Farley said Florida statutes require centralized reporting and prohibit contracts with restricted parties; where violations occur, institutional review processes can result in disciplinary action up to termination.

The hearing included a personal account from Elsa Johnson, a Stanford undergraduate and editor in chief of the Stanford Review, who said she was targeted by an individual identifying himself online as “Charles Chen” and that federal agents told her they believed he was operating on behalf of China’s Ministry of State Security. Johnson told the committee she faced intimidation, that there was no campus tip line for transnational repression, and that she had to seek FBI help herself: “There was no university resource to call, no tip line to contact.”

Several members emphasized the need to protect both research and academic freedom. Representative Suzanne Bonamici (ranking member voice in the hearing) cautioned the committee against ‘‘xenophobic conspiracy theories’’ and urged attention to student affordability and civil-rights enforcement. Others, including members who sponsored the Deterrent Act, pressed for stricter reporting and tougher penalties for undisclosed foreign agreements or gifts, arguing transparency of foreign funding protects taxpayers and national security.

The committee also discussed the Department of Education’s Section 117 compliance processes; Vice Chairman Owens noted a July 2025 compliance review that flagged $86 million in late or mislabeled foreign gift reports at Michigan. Grasso said Michigan has improved its procedures and is working to catch up with reporting changes.

The hearing did not produce formal committee action. The record is open for 14 days for members to submit additional material, and members signaled follow-up oversight on auditing compliance processes, improving campus reporting mechanisms for targeted students, and clarifying reporting thresholds under pending transparency laws.