A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Spokane County proposes agritourism rules; staff recommends conditional use permits to protect farmland

April 02, 2026 | Spokane County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Spokane County proposes agritourism rules; staff recommends conditional use permits to protect farmland
Presenter, Spokane County Planning, described proposed agritourism policies aimed at expanding farm-based tourism while protecting agricultural function.

Staff highlighted Greenbluff as a high‑value agritourism area and said many local farms already derive substantial revenue from agritourism activities such as farm markets, events and weddings. Presenter said agritourism should be accessory to active commercial farming: new uses must be incidental to farm operations and the site must contain active commercial farming or ranching.

As a policy measure, staff proposed that agritourism activities be subject to conditional use permits so county planners and neighbors can evaluate traffic, noise, sanitation, emergency/fire protection and other impacts and allow for a public hearing. Presenter also said staff will recommend criteria to ensure "no net loss of agricultural productivity" and discussed the possibility of setting an income benchmark (a percentage of farm revenue to remain from agricultural production) though the exact percentage was not specified.

"Agritourism requires a conditional use permit," Presenter said, explaining that permits allow impacts to be reviewed and neighbors to be heard.

Presenter said staff will present draft policies to the planning commission at the end of the month and encouraged feedback via the posted presentation and written comments; no changes to existing prime-ag land designations were proposed during the session, and the Growth Management Act remains a constraint on de‑designation of resource lands.

The session included public questions about wildlife corridors and small-business support but no votes or formal policy adoptions; next formal steps are TAC review, planning commission hearings and public comment leading toward a board decision later in 2026.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee