Public commenters at the Portland SD 1J policy committee meeting in March 2026 urged the district to add explicit indoor air quality goals to its climate, climate‑justice, and sustainable practices policy.
Katie Price, a former educator and parent of two Odyssey students, told the committee that classroom air quality is a daily health concern for families with asthma and immunocompromised members and urged “adding clear health‑based goals for indoor air to the climate crisis response, climate justice, and sustainable practices policy.” She described combining HVAC ventilation targets with in‑room air filtration as a practical, energy‑efficient way to improve classrooms and reduce missed school days.
Dr. Greg Benison, a biochemist and PTA treasurer at Robert Gray Middle School, cited researcher Richard Corsi and said he did not believe “4 to 6 air changes per hour in schools is sufficiently aspirational.” Quoting Corsi, Benison said buildings of the future should aim for “10 equivalent air changes per hour” and recommended a combination of HVAC ventilation and in‑room filtration to reach that target. He added that 6 effective air changes per hour from the HVAC system is achievable in new buildings and that adding room purifiers can cost‑effectively raise equivalent ACH.
Teacher and parent Tiffany Koyama Lane described teaching in rooms with low ventilation and high temperatures and framed stronger indoor‑air goals as an equity issue: older and higher‑poverty schools disproportionately lack reliable ventilation. She recommended setting 6 HVAC ACH as a foundation and using purifiers to push rooms closer to 12 ACH when feasible.
Parent Julie Wong said Harrison Park Middle School completed a $40,000,000 remodel with a new HVAC system but no post‑installation air quality report had been provided. She and other parents have requested that classroom air purifiers be turned on and asked the district for a consistent, district‑wide policy on minimum ACH and purifier use rather than ad hoc, school‑by‑school responses.
Why it matters: committee members and staff noted the district’s climate policy currently emphasizes carbon reduction and does not set explicit indoor air or temperature standards. Public commenters framed indoor‑air targets as both a health and equity measure and requested districtwide guidance, measurement, and transparency.
What the committee will do next: committee members agreed to take the testimony under consideration and listed the climate policy as a priority topic for a future meeting. No binding change to district policy was made during this session.