The Fairbanks North Star Borough Parks and Recreation Commission voted March 16 to forward Ordinance 2025-20-1N — a proposal to change Pioneer Park's name back to Alaskaland and to appropriate $50,000 for the change — to the borough assembly while asking the assembly to consider alternative or combined names.
The motion approved by the commission asked the assembly to consider names including but not limited to "Alaskaland," "Pioneer Park," or a third alternative such as "Tanana Valley Heritage Park," and to weigh fiscal implementation and community input before final action. Commissioners recorded their votes and entered a roll-call into the meeting record before adjourning.
The ordinance sponsor, Assemblymember Reeves, told the commission the renaming aligns with recommendations in the 2021 Pioneer Park master plan and is intended to "create a more welcoming environment for all of our residents" and strengthen the park's brand. Reeves added that the $50,000 appropriation would be phased into regular replacement cycles rather than spent as a single large purchase.
Public comment filled more than an hour and a half of the commission's hearing. Opponents urged the commission to retain "Pioneer Park," citing history, donations, donor intent and safety concerns. Long-time volunteer Jim Plaatke told commissioners: "The name Pioneer Park should remain exactly what it is today," and emphasized the park's role in preserving Fairbanks history. George Lounsbury, president of Pioneer Memorial Park Inc., said the park's operators and many volunteers view the name as part of the site's identity.
Other speakers described practical concerns. Susan Gibson, who recounted a delayed emergency response in which callers used the old name while first responders searched for it, told the commission that changing the name could create confusion in time-sensitive situations. Multiple commenters questioned spending $50,000 when capital needs remain across the borough's parks.
Supporters of the proposal cited outreach to Alaska Native organizations and the master-plan finding that some residents view the word "pioneer" as exclusionary. In his presentation, Reeves said the borough had received letters of support from indigenous organizations and cited the master plan's language that the existing name can be perceived as alienating to some residents.
Commissioners pressed both staff and the sponsor on history, legal authority and cost. Parks Director Matt Boyer told the commission staff's title research shows the borough controls the park's name and that the department's report is available online. He also summarized planned capital work at the park, noting the assembly has included millions in upcoming maintenance and capital funds.
After discussion the body amended the original motion to ask the assembly to consider additional naming options and context, and then approved the amended recommendation. The commission's recommendation is advisory; the borough assembly must still vote on the ordinance.
The commission recorded the recommendation and moved on to other business, including internal elections and a separate staff policy update.
What happens next: The assembly will receive the commission's recommendation and may adopt, amend or reject Ordinance 2025-20-1N. The commission's action does not itself change any park signage or budgets; those steps would require separate assembly action and implementation direction from borough staff.