A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee hears competing views on permanent daylight saving time; sponsor sets bill aside

March 31, 2026 | 2026 Legislature Alaska, Alaska


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears competing views on permanent daylight saving time; sponsor sets bill aside
The Alaska House State Affairs Committee heard sponsor and public testimony March 31 on House Bill 41, a proposal to adopt permanent daylight saving time in Alaska that would take effect if and when federal law is changed.

Sponsor Representative Allard told the committee HB41 would adopt year-round daylight saving time in state law and cited research she said links the seasonal time-change to sleep and mood disturbances and to traffic-safety harms. "Permanent daylight savings time would allow Alaska to strengthen its economy... and improve public safety," Representative Allard said as she described the bill and its sections.

The hearing drew a mixture of support and opposition in phone testimony. Larissa Fonoff of Wasilla said the clock change "disrupts family" and urged eliminating it. Phyllis Mulligan of Sitka said she enjoys summer evening daylight and supported the change. Tom Williams of Juneau recommended passing either HB41 or Senate Bill 26 so Alaska could align with federal action, saying one path might be quicker.

Several callers and an invited witness deployed research and economic arguments on both sides. Susie Crosby provided extended testimony arguing for HB41 and spotlighted the potential economic harms to summer industries under alternative proposals. JP, president of the nonprofit Safe Standard Time, called from Arizona and urged the legislature to back permanent standard time instead, citing sleep-health studies that he said show worse outcomes under daylight saving time.

Representative Allard closed by noting technical differences between HB41 and SB26 and saying she is willing to work with colleagues. The committee set HB41 aside for later consideration while it evaluates competing bills and waits for further conversations about which option to pursue.

No formal committee vote occurred on HB41 during the hearing; the item was set aside for future consideration.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee