A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Flagler Beach approves $35,700 boom lift purchase amid split vote and debate over tow‑behind vs. self‑propelled units

March 13, 2026 | Flagler Beach City, Flagler County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Flagler Beach approves $35,700 boom lift purchase amid split vote and debate over tow‑behind vs. self‑propelled units
The Flagler Beach City Commission voted March 12 to purchase a JLG ET350 tow‑behind boom lift from Everglades Equipment Group for $35,700, approving Resolution 2026‑01 after substantive discussion about equipment type, cost and long‑term value.

Staff told commissioners the tow‑behind unit is the most cost‑effective option based on recent rental patterns; the packet noted a $2,000 rental in December and staff estimated roughly four rentals per year previously. City staff said with newly hired personnel the lift may be used monthly going forward and that storage would be at the city maintenance yard near the wastewater plant. An estimated equipment lifespan of about 10 years was mentioned during discussion.

Several commissioners and members of the public pressed staff on alternatives. Former Commissioner Rick Bellingham and other public commenters urged the commission to purchase a self‑propelled, rubber‑wheeled unit instead of the tow‑behind, arguing the self‑propelled type is easier to maneuver and more useful across variable terrain. The city manager and fleet staff replied that staff reviewed both tow‑behind and self‑propelled models and favored the tow‑behind for its lower price and maneuverability in tight spaces; staff also identified 48‑ and 60‑month capital lease options if the commission preferred a trial lease.

After discussion the motion to approve the purchase passed 4‑1 (Commissioner Cunningham recorded as the lone no vote). Supporters cited immediate cost savings versus continued rentals and the ability to use the unit across multiple departments; opponents noted operational limits of the tow‑behind design and urged continued evaluation of needs and storage/hauling requirements.

Implementation steps: staff will take delivery, store the boom at the maintenance yard, and set cross‑charge billing practices for departments that use the equipment. The purchase was funded from the equipment line in the capital budget; staff said the requested purchase is less than the approximately $100,000 budgeted for equipment of this class.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee