Subcommittee backs tax exemption for broadband providers, adopts clarification to $10 million cap
March 31, 2026 | 2026 Legislative Meetings, South Carolina
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Sales and Use Tax and Income Tax Legislative Subcommittee adopted a clarifying amendment and gave a favorable report to House Bill 5,122, a measure that would exempt internet access and communication service providers from sales and use taxes on equipment and supplies used to deliver services.
Staff told the panel the bill would classify eligible providers as manufacturers for tax purposes, require providers to apply to the Department of Revenue for refunds by Jan. 31 of the following year, and cap the total refunds at $10,000,000 annually, with prorated reductions if claims exceed the cap. The committee adopted an amendment described as tightening language that the refund cap resets each year and then forwarded the bill to the full committee.
Terrence Ford, who was identified in the record as representing AT&T, testified the company faces rising costs as legacy copper networks reach end of life and that South Carolina’s current application of sales and use tax to broadband machinery and equipment places communication service providers at a competitive disadvantage with neighboring states that do not impose such taxes. "A percentage of every dollar invested goes to taxes instead of being invested into the networks," Ford said, arguing that an exemption would accelerate deployment and allow private capital to extend service into unserved areas.
Ford also told the subcommittee that cable and satellite providers currently receive similar exemptions, and he described South Carolina as disadvantaged relative to states such as North Carolina and Tennessee. That characterization was presented as industry testimony and not independently verified at the hearing.
The amendment, identified by the Chair as coming from Representative Crawford and described by the committee as clarifying the annual $10 million cap, was adopted by voice vote. Staff then recorded that House Bill 5,122 received a favorable report to the full committee.
The committee did not take additional votes on the measure at this meeting; staff called the roll for the committee and the Chair closed the item.
Staff told the panel the bill would classify eligible providers as manufacturers for tax purposes, require providers to apply to the Department of Revenue for refunds by Jan. 31 of the following year, and cap the total refunds at $10,000,000 annually, with prorated reductions if claims exceed the cap. The committee adopted an amendment described as tightening language that the refund cap resets each year and then forwarded the bill to the full committee.
Terrence Ford, who was identified in the record as representing AT&T, testified the company faces rising costs as legacy copper networks reach end of life and that South Carolina’s current application of sales and use tax to broadband machinery and equipment places communication service providers at a competitive disadvantage with neighboring states that do not impose such taxes. "A percentage of every dollar invested goes to taxes instead of being invested into the networks," Ford said, arguing that an exemption would accelerate deployment and allow private capital to extend service into unserved areas.
Ford also told the subcommittee that cable and satellite providers currently receive similar exemptions, and he described South Carolina as disadvantaged relative to states such as North Carolina and Tennessee. That characterization was presented as industry testimony and not independently verified at the hearing.
The amendment, identified by the Chair as coming from Representative Crawford and described by the committee as clarifying the annual $10 million cap, was adopted by voice vote. Staff then recorded that House Bill 5,122 received a favorable report to the full committee.
The committee did not take additional votes on the measure at this meeting; staff called the roll for the committee and the Chair closed the item.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
