A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

La Crosse council approves adding police and fire chiefs to compression-pay program

March 12, 2026 | La Crosse, La Crosse County, Wisconsin


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

La Crosse council approves adding police and fire chiefs to compression-pay program
Council members voted on March 12 to amend the city’s compression-pay provisions so that both the fire chief and the police chief are included among positions eligible for a compression payment intended to preserve pay-grade spacing among senior staff.

HR Director Rebecca Franson told the council the fire item updates a 2015 resolution and “all we are doing is adding the position of fire chief to those positions that would receive this compression pay,” noting the change is intended to restore an intended pay differential after a 0.6% compression was identified between the assistant fire chief and the fire chief. Franson said the cost for the fire resolution will be covered from the fire department’s operating budget; she estimated the impact on the 2027 budget would be between $8,000 and $10,000.

On the police side, Franson explained how the program is structured: the city takes the average earnings of police lieutenants (covered by a collective-bargaining agreement), “we add 7% to that average, and that is the minimum that our captains need to be paid,” and the amendment would add the assistant chief and police chief into that compression framework for internal equity between public-safety ranks.

Several council members voiced concern about cost and the effect of recent collective-bargaining increases. Council Member Charles said taxpayers had raised concerns about spending priorities; others warned that prior agreements with unions and multi-year 4% increases may be contributing to compression problems. Council Member Weston said she would support the measure with hesitation and urged more parity comparisons with peer municipalities.

Both resolutions were adopted with identical tallies: 8 yes, 4 no, and 1 abstention. The council recorded that the payments are structured so they may not generate immediate payouts for the newly added positions depending on yearly calculations.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee