A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Missouri River outreach: North Dakota stakeholders press basin-wide coordination and say in transfers

March 26, 2026 | 2026 Legislature ND, North Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Missouri River outreach: North Dakota stakeholders press basin-wide coordination and say in transfers
Ken Royce, program manager for the Missouri River Joint Water Board, and Jim Schmidt of the Upper Missouri Water Association summarized a March stakeholder meeting in Kansas City intended to respond to aggressive press coverage from downstream interests.

Royce said the North Dakota delegation stressed that upstream states contribute the flow that downstream users rely on and that North Dakota's current permitted withdrawals represent a small portion of total Missouri River flow. "We only use 0.1," Royce summarized when comparing permitted intake volumes to the river's total flows, a point he used to push back on rhetoric that framed the basin relationship as a "water war." The meeting gathered representatives from a range of downstream groups, including a Missouri coalition, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources and large urban and agricultural water users.

Speakers told the committee that the larger concern among downstream interests is precedent: if transfers across continental divides or other basin boundaries are widely accepted, the argument goes, it may be used elsewhere to justify large-scale interbasin exports. Royce and Schmidt urged coordinated basin advocacy and stakeholder engagement to ensure upper-basin interests are represented in any federal or interstate policy discussions.

Schmidt said the Kansas City meeting underscored the need for a basin-wide coalition to coordinate responses to potential out-of-basin demands and federal processes. He characterized the outreach as stakeholder-driven (not a state policy action) and said it should be followed by further coordination among upper-basin states and water users.

The committee asked for further detail on legal and federal interactions, and Deloitte/DWR participants said federal agreements and Corps of Engineers relationships were considered in governance evaluations of the Red River project and would be addressed in final reports.

This account is drawn from testimony by Ken Royce (Missouri River Joint Water Board) and Jim Schmidt (Upper Missouri Water Association) during the Water Topics Overview Committee meeting.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee