Jermaine Aguerro of Applied Analysis told the Senate tourism and gaming working group on March 12 that Las Vegas'style tourism-leveraging assets—stadiums or large venues combined with gaming and hotels—can produce sizable economic output but must be modeled to local conditions.
"At the outset, it was a jobs bill," Aguerro said of the Allegiant Stadium effort in Nevada. He reviewed the Nevada process (a tourism infrastructure committee, special-session legislation including Senate Bill 1 and Assembly Bill 1) and the implementation timeline that led from committee recommendations to construction. Aguerro said the public-private package and community-benefit provisions were central to getting the project approved.
Aguerro presented outcome figures for Allegiant Stadium and related investments: actual attendance grew to about 4.4 million (versus an initial projection of 1.9 million), incremental visitation outpaced projections, and the broader economic output for the studied period reached roughly $5.6 billion with $2.1 billion in wages and about 33,000 jobs. He said the stadium became one of the highest-grossing venues worldwide and materially increased ticket-tax (live entertainment tax) receipts used for general-fund purposes.
Members asked detailed questions about assumptions: whether projections are location-agnostic, the dependence on hotel-room supply and airport volume, what resort size and gaming-floor assumptions were used, and how much out-of-state spending could realistically be recaptured. Aguerro said his team used an agnostic model to illustrate scale and offered to provide the underlying schedule of rates, unit mixes and stabilization-year assumptions to the committee.
Aguerro cautioned that Hawaii differs structurally from Las Vegas (fewer hotel rooms, smaller drive-market) but said a well-programmed asset paired with infrastructure and community benefits can drive incremental visitors, stabilize seasonality and increase per-visitor spending. He urged the committee to design public-private partnerships with transparency, independent oversight and workforce/community-benefit provisions.
The working group requested follow-up material, including the model'ing assumptions, the mix of units used in projections and state-specific tax-rate applications. The chair closed the session and said the group will continue to refine options for the legislature.